1. Olyani S, Tehrani H, Esmaily H, Rezaii MM, Vahedian-Shahroodi M. Assessment of health literacy with the Newest Vital Sign and its correlation with body mass index in female adolescent students. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health. 2020;32(2):20170103. [DOI:10.1515/ijamh-2017-0103]

2. Rabie N, Fasihi Harandi T, Qorbani M. A Survey on The Effect of Group-discussion to HIV Prevention in Self-care Vulnerable Women, in Karaj in 2014-2015. Iranian Journal of Health Education and Health Promotion. 2017;5(2):113-20. [DOI:10.30699/acadpub.ijhehp.5.2.113]

3. zarrinkolah A, Dashti F, Abedi H, Masoudi SM. A Study of Puberty Health Literacy Level of the First 14-16 Year Girls Grade High School Students in the Eghlid City. Journal of Health Literacy. 2016;1(3):164-71. [DOI:10.22038/jhl.2016.10964]

4. Esmaielzadeh H, Asadi M, Miri N, Keramatkar M. Prevalence of High Risk Behaviors Among High School Students of Qazvin in 2012. IRJE. 2014; 10 (3): 75-82.

5. Marzban A. Prevalence of High Risk Behaviors in High School Students of Qom, 2016. JMJ. 2018; 16 (3): 44-51.

6. Igra V, Irwin CE. Theories of adolescent risk-taking behavior. In: Handbook of adolescent health risk behavior. DiClemente RJ, Hansen WB, Ponton LE, editors. Springer: Boston MA; 2013. p. 35-51. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4899-0203-0_3]

7. Kritsotakis G, Psarrou M, Vassilaki M, Androulaki Z, Philalithis AE. Gender differences in the prevalence and clustering of multiple health risk behaviours in young adults. Journal of advanced nursing. 2016; 72(9):2098-113. [DOI:10.1111/jan.12981] [PMID]

8. Puente D, Zabaleta E, Rodríguez-Blanco T, Cabanas M, Monteagudo M, Pueyo MJ, Jané M, Mestre N, Mercader M, Bolíbar B. Gender differences in sexual risk behaviour among adolescents in Catalonia, Spain. Gaceta Sanitaria. 2011; 25(1):13-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.gaceta.2010.07.012] [PMID]

9. Shokri N, Yusefi M, Safaye Rad I, Akbari T, Musavi S, Nazari H. Correlation between risky behaviors in the pre-university adolescent students in Hamadan with Parents' child raising method. JHPM. 2015; 5 (1):73-82.

10. Rashid K. Epidemiology of High-Risk Behaviors among Tehran Adolescent Girls and Boys. Social Welfare. 2015; 15 (57): 31-55.

11. Mello ZR, Walker EB, Finan LJ, Stiasny A, Wiggers IC, McBroom KA, Worrell FC. Time perspective, psychological outcomes, and risky behavior among runaway adolescents. Applied Developmental Science. 2018; 22(3): 233-43. [DOI:10.1080/10888691.2016.1276455]

12. Shafikhani M, Bagherian F, Shokri O. On the Relationship of Time Perspective with Tendency to Substance Abuse in Female Adolescents; Journal of research on addiction, 2016; 10(38): 11-24.

13. Golestaneh SM, Afshin SA, Dehghani Y. The Relationship between the Time Perspective and Achievement Goal, the Academic Procrastination and Academic Achievement of Students in Various Colleges of the University of the Gulf. Social Cognition Journal. 2016; 5(2): 52-71.

14. Zimbardo P, Boyd J. The time paradox: The new psychology of time that will change your life. New York: Simon and Schuster; 2008.

15. Chavarria J, Allan NP, Moltisanti A, Taylor J. The effects of present hedonistic time perspective and past negative time perspective on substance use consequences. Drug and alcohol dependence. 2015; 152: 39-46. [DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.04.027] [PMID]

16. McKay MT, Andretta JR, Magee J, Worrell FC. What do temporal profiles tell us about adolescent alcohol use? Results from a large sample in the United Kingdom. Journal of Adolescence. 2014; 37(8): 1319-28. [DOI:10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.09.008] [PMID]

17. Zentsova NI, Leonov SV. Comparative characteristics of time perspective of professional athletes and drug addicted people. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013; 78: 340-4. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.307]

18. Mello ZR, Oladipo SE, Paoloni VC, Worrell FC. Time perspective and risky behaviors among Nigerian young adults. Journal of Adult Development. 2019;26(3):161-71. [DOI:10.1007/s10804-018-9304-2]

19. Steinberg L, Monahan KC. Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental psychology. 2007; 43(6):1531-1543. [DOI:10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1531] [PMID] [PMCID]

20. Rahmani M, Ghasemi V, Hashemianfar A. Investigation of the Effect of Social Relations on High-Risk Behaviors of Adolescents of Bojnourd City, Iran. Journal of Applied sociology. 2016; 27(1): 1-26.

21. Gioia F. Peer effects on risk behaviour: the importance of group identity. Experimental Economics. 2017; 20(1): 100-129. [DOI:10.1007/s10683-016-9478-z] [PMID] [PMCID]

22. Daspe M, Arbel R, Ramos M, Shapiro L; Margolin G. Deviant Peers and Adolescent Risky Behaviors: The Protective Effect of Nonverbal Display of Parental Warmth. Journal of research on adolescence. 2018; 21(4): 1-16. [DOI:10.1111/jora.12418] [PMID]

23. Feenstra H, Ruiter RA, Kok G. Social-cognitive correlates of risky adolescent cycling behavior. BMC public health. 2010; 10(1):408. [DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-10-408] [PMID] [PMCID]

24. Kohli A, Remy MM, Binkurhorhwa AK, Mitima CM, Mirindi AB, Mwinja NB, Banyewesize JH, Ntakwinja GM, Perrin NA, Glass N. Preventing risky behaviours among young adolescents in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo: A qualitative study. Global public health. 2018; 13(9):1241-53. [DOI:10.1080/17441692.2017.1317009] [PMID] [PMCID]

25. Zadeh Mohammadi A, Ahmadabadi Z, Heidari M. Construction and Assessment of Psychometric Features of Iranian Adolescents Risk-Taking Scale. IJPCP. 2011; 17(3): 218-225.

26. Zimbardo PG, Boyd JN. Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1999; 77(6): 1271-1288. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271]

27. Vahid dastjerdi L, Nilforooshan L. Work Hope: The Role of Personal and Social Factors and Family Support. Positive Psychology Journal. 2016; 1(4): 15-28.

28. Tahmasian K, Gholamrezaee M. The Relationship between Self-efficacy and Peer Rejection. Journal of Modern Psychological Researches. 2009; 4(14): 107-123.

29. Laureiro-Martinez D, Trujillo CA, Unda J. Time perspective and age: A review of age associated differences. Frontiers in psychology. 2017; 8:101. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00101] [PMID] [PMCID]

30. Sircova A, Van De Vijver FJ, Osin E, Milfont TL, Fieulaine N, Kislali-Erginbilgic A, Zimbardo PG. Time perspective profiles of cultures. In: Time perspective theory; review, research and application. Stolarski M, Fieulaine N, van Beek W, editors. Springer: Cham; 2015. p. 169-187. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2_11]

31. Precin P. Past negative time perspective as a predictor of grade point average in occupational therapy doctoral students. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2017; 5(2): 3-31. [DOI:10.15453/2168-6408.1264]

32. Holman EA, Zimbardo PG. The social language of time: The time perspective-social network connection. Basic and applied social psychology. 2009; 31(2):136-47. [DOI:10.1080/01973530902880415]

33. Zabelina E, Chestyunina Y, Trushina I, Vedeneyeva E. Time Perspective as a Predictor of Procrastination. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2018; 238:87-93. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2018.03.011]