[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
Publication Ethics::
Editorial policy::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Reviewe::
::
Citation Impact
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
COPE Membership

AWT IMAGE

..
Creative Commons Licence
..
Open access
..
:: ::
Back to the articles list Back to browse issues page
Predictors of Environmentally Responsible Behaviors Based on the Constructs of the Theory of Planned Behavior Among Lower Secondary School Students
Zhina Ebrahimi , Nahid Navidjouy , Hamid Reza Khalkhali , Mina Maheri *
Abstract:   (105 Views)
Background and Objectives: Promoting environmentally responsible behaviors (ERBs) among students, can play a significant role in environmental preservation. Identifying the factors influencing these behaviors through theoretical frameworks such as the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) can provide a scientific basis for designing effective educational interventions. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the predictors of ERBs based on the constructs of the TPB among lower secondary school students.

Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 285 lower secondary school students were included. The data collection tool was a researcher-made questionnaire with two sections: the first collected demographic information, and the second included questions based on TPB constructs related to ERBs. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS software, which included descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, range, percentage, and frequency) as well as analytical tests such as the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, Pearson correlation, and multiple linear regression.

Results: The constructs of perceived behavioral control (β = 0.655, p < 0.001), subjective norms (β = 0.137, p = 0.008), and attitude (β = 0.109, p = 0.009) were predictors of intention to adopt ERBs. Additionally, behavioral intention (β = 0.650, p < 0.001) and perceived behavioral control (β = 0.144, p = 0.029) were predictors of engagement in ERBs. The constructs of TPB explained approximately 67% of the variance in intention to adopt ERBs and approximately 66% of the variance in ERBs.

Conclusion: The TPB is a logical and suitable theoretical framework for identifying the cognitive and psychological factors influencing the intention and performance of ERBs. It can serve as a basis for designing targeted educational interventions in environmental education among lower secondary school students. Focusing on strengthening positive attitudes, establishing supportive social norms, and enhancing perceived behavioral control can increase the effectiveness of these interventions in promoting ERBs.

Open Access Policy: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
 
Keywords: Predictor, Environmentally Responsible Behavior, Theory of Planned Behavior, School Student
     
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Health Education & Health Promotion
Received: 2025/03/10 | Accepted: 2025/07/16
References
1. Zare B, Niazi A, Habibpour K, Karami N. Meta-analysis of influential factors on environmental behaviors among citizens. Social Problems of Iran. 2020;11(1): 281-297. (In Persian)
2. Nadem Souraki M, Nejatzadeh F, Gholami-Borujeni F. Level of environmental knowledge, attitude, and performance of the citizens of Mazandaran province in 2021. Iranian Journal of Health and Environment. 2023;15(4):691-700. (In Persian)
3. Ardoin NM, Bowers AW, Gaillard E. Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. Biological conservation. 2020;241:108224. [DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108224]
4. Lee TH, Jan FH, Yang CC. Environmentally responsible behavior of nature-based tourists: A review. International Journal of Development and Sustainability. 2013;2(1):100-115.
5. Fenitra RM, Premananto GC, Sedera RM, Abbas A, Laila N. Environmentally responsible behavior and Knowledge-Belief-Norm in the tourism context: The moderating role of types of destinations. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks. 2022;10(2):273-288. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijgeop.2022.05.001]
6. Van De Wetering J, Leijten P, Spitzer J, Thomaes S. Does environmental education benefit environmental outcomes in children and adolescents? A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2022;81:101782. [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101782]
7. Husin A, Helmi H, Nengsih YK, Rendana M. Environmental education in schools: sustainability and hope. Discover Sustainability. 2025;6(41):1-11. [DOI:10.1007/s43621-025-00837-2]
8. Asadi M, Naghizadeh MM, Mazloomi S, Ghazanfari Z. Knowledge, attitude, and responsible environmental behaviors among female secondary school students. Payesh (Health Monitor). 2018;17(6):677-686.
9. De Alwis R, De Silva AD. Education for responsible environmental behavior: Evidence from Sri Lanka. European Journal of Mathematics and Science Education. 2020;1(2):107-119. [DOI:10.12973/ejmse.1.2.107]
10. Aqanaghad M, Hamzehnezad R, Rezaii A, Seyflou MA. The Status of Environmental Literacy and its Relationship with Environmental Ethics among Secondary Education Schools Students. Depiction of Health. 2023;14(4):451-466. [DOI:10.34172/doh.2023.35]
11. Bahar F, Sahin E. An associational research on Turkish children's environmentally responsible behaviors, nature relatedness, and motive concerns. Science Education International. 2017;28(2):111-118. [DOI:10.33828/sei.v28.i2.3]
12. De Leeuw A, Valois P, Ajzen I, Schmidt P. Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for educational interventions. Journal of environmental psychology.2015;42:128-138. [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.03.005]
13. Yuriev A, Dahmen M, Paillé P, Boiral O, Guillaumie L. Pro-environmental behaviors through the lens of the theory of planned behavior: A scoping review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2020;155:104660. [DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104660]
14. Ebrahimi M, Mohammadi Zeidi I, Maleki MR, Mohammadi Zeidi B. Explaining the psychological variables effective on pro-environmental behavior in the elementary school students at qazvin city: application of the theory of planned behavior. Pajouhan Scientific Journal. 2024;22(1):55-67. [DOI:10.61186/psj.22.1.55]
15. Ghorbanzadeh S, Maheri M, Khalkhali HR, Didarloo A. Predictive factors of adopting COVID-19 preventive behaviors among the urban population: An application of the health belief model. Iranian Journal of Health Education and Health Promotion. 2022;10(3):237-250. [DOI:10.52547/ijhehp.10.3.237]
16. Huang H. Media use, environmental beliefs, self-efficacy, and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Business Research. 2016;69(6):2206-2212. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.031]
17. Kamal F, Fouladi Fard R, Sabahi Hoveida A, Gharlipour Z, Rezaie Rahimi N. Designing and evaluating the validity and reliability of environmental behavior tools. Iranian Journal of Health and Environment. 2021;14(2):285-298.
18. Vakili MM, Jahangiri N. Content validity and reliability of the measurement tools in educational, behavioral, and health sciences research. Journal of Medical Education Development. 2018;10(28):106-118. [DOI:10.29252/edcj.10.28.106]
19. Ashrafi E, Mansourian M, Ebadi Fard Azar F, Osmani F, Nouri M. Validation of Nutrition Literacy Questionnaire for High School Students. Journal of Nutrition and Food Security. 2024; 9(4): 631-642. [DOI:10.18502/jnfs.v9i4.16891]
20. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
21. Karimi S, Liobikienė G, Saadi H, Sepahvand F. The influence of media usage on iranian students' pro-environmental behaviors: An application of the extended theory of planned behavior. Sustainability. 2021;13(15):8299. [DOI:10.3390/su13158299]
22. Phang G, Ilham Z. Theory of planned behavior to understand pro-environmental behavior among Universiti Malaya students. AIMS Environmental Science. 2023;10(5):691-708. [DOI:10.3934/environsci.2023038]
23. Sharma M. Theoretical foundations of health education and health promotion. 3th ed. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2021.
24. Mirzaei H, Shahramian I, Khosravi A, Mansouri A. Evaluation of the effect of education based on BASNEF model on reducing death anxiety in diabetic patients with Coronavirus. Journal of Diabetes Nursing. 2021;9(1):1330-1338.
25. Aziz A. Applying theory of planned behavior to understand pro-environmental intention and behavior of students. Arthatama. 2019;3(1):1-15.
26. Kotyza P, Cabelkova I, Pierański B, Malec K, Borusiak B, Smutka L, Nagy S, Gawel A, Bernardo López Lluch D, Kis K, Gál J. The predictive power of environmental concern, perceived behavioral control and social norms in shaping pro-environmental intentions: a multicountry study. Frontiers in ecology and evolution. 2024;12:1289139. [DOI:10.3389/fevo.2024.1289139]
27. Karimi S, Liobikienė G, Alitavakoli F. The effect of religiosity on pro-environmental behavior based on the theory of planned behavior: A cross-sectional study among Iranian rural female facilitators. Frontiers in psychology. 2022;13:745019. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.745019] [PMID] []
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

Ethics code: IR.UMSU.REC.1403.010


XML   Persian Abstract   Print



Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to the articles list Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه آموزش بهداشت و ارتقاء سلامت ایران Iranian Journal of Health Education and Health Promotion
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.08 seconds with 42 queries by YEKTAWEB 4714