Predicting Violence Based on Early Maladaptive Schemas: The Mediating Role of Psychological Flexibility and Distress Tolerance in Prisoners

Goodarzi, Mahmoud; Sheikh Esmaeili, Delnia; Morovati, Faramarz; Akbari, Reza

[Home ] [Archive]

[ فارسی ]

Iranian Journal of Health Education and Health Promotion

فصلنامه آموزش بهداشت و ارتقاء سلامت ایران

Main Menu

Home

Journal Information

Articles archive

For Authors

Publication Ethics

Editorial policy

Contact us

Site Facilities

Reviewe

Citation Impact

Search in website

COPE Membership

Creative Commons Licence

Open access

Back to the articles list

Back to browse issues page

Predicting Violence Based on Early Maladaptive Schemas: The Mediating Role of Psychological Flexibility and Distress Tolerance in Prisoners

Mahmoud Goodarzi

, Delnia Sheikh Esmaeili

, Faramarz Morovati ^*

, Reza Akbari

Abstract: (13 Views)

Background and Objectives: Violence in prisons is a major challenge within the penal system, associated with extensive individual and social consequences. The present study aimed to predict violence based on early maladaptive schemas, with the mediating role of psychological flexibility and distress tolerance, in male prisoners in Kermanshah.

Materials & Methods: This research was applied in purpose and descriptive correlational in method. The statistical population comprised all male prisoners in Kermanshah Central Prison in 2025 (1404 AH). A total of 305 participants were selected through multi stage cluster random sampling. Data were collected using the Young Early Maladaptive Schema Questionnaire Short Form, the Akbari et al. Psychological Flexibility Questionnaire, the Simons & Gaher Distress Tolerance Scale, and the Williams et al. Aggression Questionnaire. Data analysis was performed using Pearson correlation coefficient and path analysis within a structural equation modelling framework, along with the bootstrap method, employing SPSS 26 and AMOS 23.

Results: The findings indicated that the proposed model had a good fit (CMIN/DF=1.99, RMSEA=0.057, CFI=0.998). Early maladaptive schemas had a significant positive direct effect on violence (β=0.40, P<0.001). Furthermore, the total indirect effect of schemas on violence through psychological flexibility and distress tolerance was negative and significant (β=-0.23, P<0.001). Overall, the predictor variables explained 56% of the variance in violence.

Conclusion: Early maladaptive schemas lead to increased violence in prisoners both directly and indirectly, by reducing psychological flexibility and decreasing distress tolerance. These findings have important practical implications for designing psychological interventions based on schema therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), and dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) within the rehabilitation and correctional system.

Open Access Policy: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Keywords: Violence, Early Maladaptive Schemas, Psychological Flexibility, Distress Tolerance, Prisoners

Type of Study: Research | Subject: Health Behavior
Received: 2026/03/25 | Accepted: 2026/08/2

References

1. Krug EG, Mercy JA, Dahlberg LL, Zwi AB. The world report on violence and health. The lancet. 2002 Oct 5;360(9339):1083-8. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11133-0] [PMID]

2. Corso PS, Mercy JA, Simon TR, Finkelstein EA, Miller TR. interpersonal and self-directed violence in the United States. Am J Prev Med 2007; 32: 474-82. [DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.02.010] [PMID]

3. De Leo D, Bertolote JM, Lester D, Krug E, Dahlberg LL, Mercy JA, Zwi A, Lozano R. World report on violence and health. World Health Organization. 2002 Nov 23.

4. World Health Organization. Violence against women prevalence estimates, 2023 [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2025 [cited 2026 Jul 5]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240116962

5. Ginzburg D. Psychological determinants of angry and aggressive behaviour in violent prisoners. Journal of forensic psychology. 2022;7(12):1-.

6. Hornsveld RH, Kraaimaat FW. Psychological factors predicting violent prison inmates' anger and aggression. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice. 2023 Oct 20;23(5):472-88. [DOI:10.1080/24732850.2022.2048768]

7. Lanciano T, de Leonardis L, Curci A. The psychological effects of imprisonment: The role of cognitive, psychopathic and affective traits. Europe's journal of psychology. 2022 Aug 31;18(3):262. [DOI:10.5964/ejop.3995] [PMID] [PMCID]

8. Taylor CD, Bee P, Haddock G. Does schema therapy change schemas and symptoms? A systematic review across mental health disorders. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. 2017 Sep;90(3):456-79. [DOI:10.1111/papt.12112] [PMID] [PMCID]

9. Nordahl D, Høifødt RS, Bohne A, Landsem IP, Wang CE, Thimm JC. Early maladaptive schemas as predictors of maternal bonding to the unborn child. BMC psychology. 2019 Apr 11;7(1):23. [DOI:10.1186/s40359-019-0297-9] [PMID] [PMCID]

10. Thimm JC. Early maladaptive schemas and interpersonal problems: A circumplex analysis of the YSQ-SF. International journal of psychology and psychological therapy. 2013;13(1):113-24.

11. Young JE, Klosko JS, Weishaar ME. Schema therapy: A practitioner's guide. guilford press; 2006 Nov 1.

12. Jam F. Predicting self injurious behaviors based on early maladaptive schemas in adolescents using drugs. Journal of New Advances in Psychology, Educational Sciences and Education. 2023;6(65):74 85.

13. Najafi S, Sattarpour F. Comparison of early maladaptive schemas in returned check prisoners and normal individuals. Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry of Cognition. 2014;1(2):16-27.

14. Sousa M, Gouveia C, Cunha O, de Castro Rodrigues A. The effectiveness of schema therapy in individuals who committed crimes: a systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2024 Dec;25(5):3631-42. [DOI:10.1177/15248380241254082] [PMID] [PMCID]

15. Mohseni S, Barzgar M, Rezaei A. The influence of cognitive emotion regulation strategies on the causal links between early maladaptive schemas, anger rumination and aggression. Journal of Psychological Science. 2023;21(119):2269-83. [DOI:10.52547/JPS.21.119.2269]

16. Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG. Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change. Guilford press; 2011.

17. Donahue JJ, Buck B, Chauhan K. A multi-sample investigation of psychological flexibility processes and reactive and proactive functions of aggression. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science. 2024 Jan 1;31:100721. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100721]

18. Ganson KT, O'Connor J, Nagata JM, Lipson SK. Association between psychological flexibility and physical violence perpetration in college student populations: results from the national Healthy Minds Study. Journal of American college health. 2023 Jul 24;71(6):1646-50. [DOI:10.1080/07448481.2021.1953030] [PMID]

19. Kim SH, Son C. Effects of entrapment, anger, psychological flexibility, and self-compassion on the ward climate and reactive aggression in forensic psychiatric hospital patients. International journal of law and psychiatry. 2024 May 1;94:101986. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijlp.2024.101986] [PMID]

20. Simons JS, Gaher RM. The Distress Tolerance Scale: Development and validation of a self-report measure. Motivation and emotion. 2005 Jun;29(2):83-102. [DOI:10.1007/s11031-005-7955-3]

21. Kyron MJ, Hooke GR, Bryan CJ, Page AC. Distress tolerance as a moderator of the dynamic associations between interpersonal needs and suicidal thoughts. Suicide and life‐threatening behavior. 2022 Feb;52(1):159-70. [DOI:10.1111/sltb.12814] [PMID]

22. Martin RL, Bauer BW, Ramsey KL, Green BA, Capron DW, Anestis MD. How distress tolerance mediates the relationship between posttraumatic stress disorder and the interpersonal theory of suicide constructs in a US military sample. Suicide and Life‐Threatening Behavior. 2019 Oct;49(5):1318-31. [DOI:10.1111/sltb.12523] [PMID]

23. Leyro TM, Zvolensky MJ, Bernstein A. Distress tolerance and psychopathological symptoms and disorders: a review of the empirical literature among adults. Psychological bulletin. 2010 Jul;136(4):576. [DOI:10.1037/a0019712] [PMID] [PMCID]

24. Brem MJ, Florimbio AR, Elmquist J, Shorey RC, Stuart GL. Antisocial traits, distress tolerance, and alcohol problems as predictors of intimate partner violence in men arrested for domestic violence. Psychology of violence. 2018 Jan;8(1):132. [DOI:10.1037/vio0000088] [PMID] [PMCID]

25. Tabesh S, Zia-Tohidi A, Firoozi M, Farahani H. Decomposing the variance in early maladaptive schemas: the major role of one general factor, the minor role of domains, and their differential relations to facial emotion recognition. Frontiers in psychology. 2024 May 15;15:1342480. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1342480] [PMID] [PMCID]

26. Pilkington PD, Karantzas GC, Faustino B, Pizarro‐Campagna E. Early maladaptive schemas, emotion regulation difficulties and alexithymia: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 2024 Jan;31(1):e2914. [DOI:10.1002/cpp.2914] [PMID]

27. Baranoff J, Oei TP, Cho SH, Kwon SM. Factor structure and internal consistency of the Young Schema Questionnaire (Short Form) in Korean and Australian samples. Journal of affective disorders. 2006 Jul 1;93(1-3):133-40. [DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2006.03.003] [PMID]

28. Rijkeboer MM, van den Bergh H, van den Bout J. Stability and discriminative power of the Young Schema-Questionnaire in a Dutch clinical versus non-clinical population. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 2005 Jun 1;36(2):129-44. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbtep.2004.08.005] [PMID]

29. Mahbobi T, Salimi H, Hossini SA. The Effect of Emotional Self-control Training on the Reduction of Verbal Aggression of Payame Noor University Students. Social Cognition. 2015;4(2):124-137.

30. Redondo N, Peña ME, Graña JL, Andreu JM. Psychometric properties of the Aggression Questionnaire: A replication in a sample of partner-assaultive men in psychological treatment. Psicothema. 2017;29(4):584-9. [DOI:10.7334/psicothema2016.390] [PMID]

31. Akbari M, Disabato D, Seydavi M, Zamani E. The Persian personalized psychological flexibility index (P-PPFI): Psychometric properties in a general population sample of Iranians. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science. 2021 Oct 1;22:32-43. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcbs.2021.09.004]

32. Ghahari S, Vaisi F, Kavand H, Yekefallah M, Zandifar H, Farrokhi N, Davoodi R. Psychometric Properties of Early Maladaptive Schemas Questionnaire Short Form-75 Items (YSQ-SF). Nurse and Physician Within War. 2020;8(27):31-40. [DOI:10.29252/npwjm.8.27.31]

33. Kianfar F, Bahonar F, Saniee Manesh M. Psychometric Properties of the Emotion Regulation Strategies Questionnaire and the Distress Tolerance Questionnaire in High School Students. Quarterly Journal of Applied Research in Counseling. 2023;6(1):33-53.

34. Babakhanian M, Sharif-Nia H, Ghazanfarpour M, Hosseini L. Psychometrics Properties of the Persian Version of Distress Tolerance Scale for Alcoholics and Drug Addicts. IJ Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences. 2025 Sep 1;19(19):e163830. [DOI:10.5812/ijpbs-129765]

Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article